Export limit exceeded: 12399 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12399 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-70474 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Flowise is a drag-and-drop user interface for building customized large language model (LLM) flows. Prior to 3.1.3, Flowise has three OAuth2 credential endpoints that look up credentials by id alone with no workspaceId filter. The authorize, callback, and refresh handlers query the Credential table by id only; callback and refresh are whitelisted from authentication. This allows any authenticated user to initiate OAuth2 flows against credentials belonging to other workspaces, allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge OAuth2 callbacks to overwrite tokens in any credential, and allows an unauthenticated attacker to refresh tokens for any credential. The affected routes include /api/v1/oauth2-credential/authorize/<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>, /api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback?code=ATTACKER_AUTH_CODE&state=<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>, and /api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh/<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70481 | 1 Open-webui | 1 Open-webui | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.5.0 until 0.11.0, the standard channel message update and delete handlers accepted any caller holding write access on the channel without checking that the caller wrote the message. Because write access is the same grant a member needs to post, any ordinary participant in a shared standard channel could rewrite or permanently delete another participant message, while group and direct message handlers enforced authorship. This issue is fixed in 0.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7753 | 2 Stylemixthemes, Wordpress | 2 Cost Calculator Builder, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Cost Calculator Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of sensitive data due to a missing capability check on the `cost-calculator-custom-export-run` AJAX action (handler `CCBExportImport::export_calculators()`) in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.17. The handler only verifies a nonce, but the corresponding `ccb_export_nonce` is broadcast on every wp-admin page (including pages reachable to Subscribers, such as `/wp-admin/profile.php`) by the `ccb_add_admin_nonces` callback hooked to `admin_head`. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to export every calculator's full configuration — including stored Stripe secret keys, PayPal client secrets, Razorpay secret keys, webhook secret keys, and reCAPTCHA secret keys. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12000 | 2 Cyberlord92, Wordpress | 2 Page And Post Restriction, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| The Page and Post Restriction plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions up to and including 1.4.0 via the WordPress core REST endpoints /wp-json/wp/v2/pages, /wp-json/wp/v2/pages/<id>, /wp-json/wp/v2/posts, and /wp-json/wp/v2/posts/<id>. This is due to the plugin's REST guards — papr_restrict_page_post_rest_api() and the the_posts filter registered by papr_filter_posts() — sourcing their restricted-ID list exclusively from papr_get_restricted_posts_id(), which only reads the per-page metabox options papr_allowed_redirect_for_pages and papr_allowed_redirect_for_posts and never consults the two global toggles papr_access_for_only_loggedin and papr_access_for_only_loggedin_posts that the plugin's own UI describes as 'Make all Pages Private' / 'Make all Posts Private'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read the full rendered content of every published page and post on sites configured with the documented global toggles, bypassing the security boundary enforced on the frontend by papr_restrict_logged_in_users(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-67616 | 1 Owen2345 | 1 Camaleon Cms | 2026-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| Camaleon CMS through 2.9.2, fixed in commit 88ab703, contains a missing authorization vulnerability on the drafts endpoint that allows any authenticated low-privileged user to create draft posts by bypassing role and permission checks. Attackers can send requests to the drafts endpoint using only session authentication to create unauthorized drafts that appear in the administrative drafts queue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7726 | 2 Techeshta, Wordpress | 2 Layouts For Wpbakery, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Layouts for WPBakery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized actions due to a missing capability check on the `Layouts_WPB_Remote::template_sync()` callback registered via `wp_ajax_nopriv_handle_sync` in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.3. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force the WordPress server to issue outbound HTTP requests to the plugin vendor's external API (`https://www.layoutsforwpbakery.com/wp-json/layoutsforwpbakery/v1/{templates,categories}`) and to write the JSON-decoded responses verbatim into the site's `wp_options` table via `set_transient()` — at any rate the attacker chooses, with no nonce verification, capability check, or rate limiting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18819 | 2 Racktables, Racktables Project | 2 Racktables, Racktables | 2026-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in RackTables up to 0.22.0/e5fff9f8aab339798ed47e8c6d7d977ed97a82bd. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project maintainer confirms: "[I]t seems plausible, in that RackTables does not at this time have any CSRF prevention. You may assign a CVE ID to this, but there is no guarantee it will be handled in urgent, or even timely, manner, or at all." | ||||
| CVE-2026-70488 | 1 Open-webui | 1 Open-webui | 2026-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.6 until 0.11.0, the sync cleanup endpoint authorized write access to the knowledge base in the URL but then acted on directory and file ids supplied in the request body without checking that those objects belonged to that knowledge base. A user with write access to one knowledge base could delete directories and remove file embeddings from another knowledge base, causing documents to drop out of retrieval results and breaking chat-with-file for targeted documents without disclosing contents. This issue is fixed in 0.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70494 | 1 Open-webui | 1 Open-webui | 2026-08-05 | 8.1 High |
| Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.10.0 until 0.11.0, the DELETE /api/v1/folders/{id} handler in backend/open_webui/routers/folders.py allowed a user granted write access to a shared chat folder to permanently delete chats and messages belonging to the folder owner. The cascade following the authorization check is bound to the folder owner's id, but the subfolder check accepted any inherited write grant instead of requiring ownership or administrator status. A collaborator can destroy the owner's subtree or force-move chats out of it when delete_contents=false. This issue is fixed in 0.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71201 | 1 Openstack | 1 Ironic | 2026-08-05 | 5 Medium |
| In OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0, a project reader that makes a crafted request to Ironic can return Portgroups assigned to Nodes owned or leased by another project. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69262 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, `DELETE /api/v1/chatflows/:id` authorized requests with checkAnyPermission('chatflows:delete,agentflows:delete'), so possession of either permission was sufficient to reach the delete path. The delete logic then resolved the target record only by id and workspaceId and did not validate the target resource type, allowing a caller with only agentflows:delete to delete a CHATFLOW and a caller with only chatflows:delete to delete an AGENTFLOW in the same workspace. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68979 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Apache NiFI 1.10.0 through 2.10.0 provide a Parameter Context update REST API method that does not enforce authorization checking on components referencing Parameter values. Updating a Parameter Context can change parameter values that affect referencing components, but framework authorization was limited to read and write privileges on the Parameter Context itself. As a result of the missing authorization, an authenticated user authorized to modify a Parameter Context, but not authorized on referencing components, could alter Parameter values affecting those components. In deployments where a Parameter value contains executable scripting content, updating a Parameter can result in code execution during automatic component validation, without starting the referencing component. The impact was limited to stopped components by existing verification checks, and the issue applies only to deployments that use component-level authorization policies. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.11.0 is the recommended mitigation, which aligns the Parameter Context update method authorization with other methods, adding authorization checking on affected components. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71192 | 1 Openstack | 1 Swift | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| In OpenStack Swift through 2.38.0, the S3API middleware does not sanitize Swift-native control headers (X-Copy-From, X-Copy-From-Account) from S3 API requests when s3_acl=true. An attacker can inject these headers into a signed PUT request targeting their own bucket, causing Swift to perform a server-side copy from another tenant's private object. The source object authorization is bypassed because the S3API middleware has already authorized the request against the destination. The attacker can read any object whose project_id, container name, and object name are known, regardless of the source object's ACLs or ownership. This requires the non-default s3_acl=true configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6079 | 2 Ho3einie, Wordpress | 2 Material Dashboard, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 7.3 High |
| The Material Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and modification of data due to missing capability checks on the amd_ajax_target_task_manager() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.10. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enumerate all scheduled tasks (potentially exposing PII), execute arbitrary tasks, and delete any task via the public_amd_ajax_handler AJAX action. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7105 | 2 Wordpress, Xpro | 2 Wordpress, Xpro Addons — 140+ Widgets For Elementor | 2026-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Xpro Addons plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized creation of data due to a missing capability check on the `get_menu_content_editor()` function in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to create arbitrary published posts of the `xpro_content` custom post type with attacker-controlled titles. The created posts are publicly queryable on the front-end, enabling content injection, SEO spam, and database pollution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7520 | 2 Mailmunch, Wordpress | 2 Mailmunch Forms For Mailchimp, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 8.1 High |
| The MailChimp Forms by MailMunch plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the `sign_in()` and `sign_up()` AJAX handlers in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to relink the site's MailMunch integration to an attacker-controlled MailMunch account by submitting attacker-supplied credentials. Once relinked, all subscriber data captured by the plugin's forms is delivered to the attacker, and the forms/landing pages rendered on the site are pulled from the attacker's MailMunch account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71247 | 1 Documenso | 1 Documenso | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| Documenso's sign-field-with-token.ts, used by the live document-signing UI, allows a recipient with the ASSISTANT role to fetch and complete fields belonging to any later-or-equal-order, not-yet-signed recipient in the same envelope, with no restriction on field type. The handler upserts a Signature record tied to the target field's recipientId with no check that field.type is SIGNATURE and the acting recipient owns it. A newer V2 signing path (sign-envelope-field.ts) explicitly blocks assistants from completing SIGNATURE fields, and the project's own test suite comments confirm this guard is absent from the V1 path used here. In a sequential-signing document, an assistant recipient can therefore forge another signer's signature field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54418 | 1 Leantime | 1 Leantime | 2026-08-05 | 8.1 High |
| Leantime through 3.6.2 exposes the JSON-RPC methods leantime.rpc.TwoFA.TwoFA.getSetupData, saveSecret, verifyAndEnable, and disable2FA, which act on a caller-supplied userId parameter with no ownership check, session pinning, or permission-attribute gate (unlike other RPC-exposed methods in the same dispatcher). Any authenticated user can invoke getSetupData with an arbitrary userId to read that user's live TOTP secret, or disable2FA to strip another account's two-factor authentication entirely, fully defeating account-level 2FA protection. This is related to CVE-2026-15509, which covers a similar missing-authorization pattern in the JSON-RPC editUser/addUser role-assignment path in the same application; the TwoFA service methods addressed here are a distinct, independently fixable set of RPC endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68980 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Apache NiFi 2.0.0 through 2.10.0 support creating, reading, and deleting Assets associated with Parameter Contexts through the REST API. The framework authorizes asset deletion against the owning Parameter Context using the supplied Parameter Context Identifier and Asset Identifier. The framework performed authorized based on the supplied Parameter Context Identifier without verifying the requested Identifier against the stored Identifier. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement different levels of authorization across Parameter Contexts are not subject to this vulnerability, because the framework enforces write permissions as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.11.0 is the recommended mitigation, which verifies Parameter Context ownership of the requested Asset before deletion using the same strategy applied to Asset read operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50528 | 2 Microsoft, Redhat | 5 .net, Microsoft Visual Studio 2022, Visual Studio 2022 and 2 more | 2026-08-05 | 8.2 High |
| Incorrect authorization in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | ||||