| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Thesaurus Management System component in Oracle E-Business Suite and OPA 4.5.2 Applications has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Vuln# OPA01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3, 9.0.3.1, and 9.0.4.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS06. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS07. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Oracle Application Server (OracleAS) Discussion Forum Portlet allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) RowKeyValue parameter in the PORTAL schema; and the (2) title and (3) content input fields when creating an forum article. |
| The PORTAL schema in Oracle Application Server (OracleAS) Discussion Forum Portlet allows remote attackers to obtain the source code for arbitrary JSP and other files via a df_next_page parameter with a trailing null byte (%00). |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Oracle 10g Release 1 before CPU Jan 2006 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via multiple parameters in (1) ATTACH_JOB, (2) HAS_PRIVS, and (3) OPEN_JOB functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT package; and (4) UPDATE_JOB, (5) ACTIVE_JOB, (6) ATTACH_POSSIBLE, (7) ATTACH_TO_JOB, (8) CREATE_NEW_JOB, (9) DELETE_JOB, (10) DELETE_MASTER_TABLE, (11) DETACH_JOB, (12) GET_JOB_INFO, (13) GET_JOB_QUEUES, (14) GET_SOLE_JOBNAME, (15) MASTER_TBL_LOCK, and (16) VALID_HANDLE functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT_INT package. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that these issues has been addressed by Oracle. It is unclear which, if any, Oracle Vuln# identifiers apply to these issues. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0.2 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# REP03. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# REP04. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that this issue is related to directory traversal that allows reading of portions of arbitrary XML files via the customize parameter. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC01 in the Protocol Support component. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 6.0.8.26(PS17) and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) REP05 and (2) REP06 in the Oracle Reports Developer component. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that REP05 is the same as CVE-2005-2378 and REP06 is the same as CVE-2005-2371, both of which involve directory traversal. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 9.2.0.7, Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.1, Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i), and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# WF01 in the Oracle Workflow Cartridge component. |
| Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. |
| The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). |
